In light of recent geopolitical events it becomes crucial to discuss the role of fact-checking on the internet and in public discourse at large, especially in what concerns the fight agains misinformation. The internet has revolutionized communication once and for all, to the point where public discourse has become inseparable from platforms like X, YouTube, Facebook and Instagram. And while there have been many cases of malpractice and lack of transparency when it comes to fact checking, the decision by some platforms to reduce or even eliminate it poses a significant risk—one that could accelerate the spread of misinformation and erode trust in digital spaces. Therefore, in order to contribute to this debate with a nuanced understanding of the importance of fact checking, we’ll be diving into the risks associated with the absence of fact checking, and how to avoid them.
The Importance of Fact-Checking in the Digital Age
Firstly, we need to understand why fact checking exists, and what drives platforms to dedicate their resources and human effort to verify the accuracy of information shared online.
One of the byproducts of how the internet works is that any single piece of misinformation can go viral within minutes, reaching millions of people in an incredibly short period of time, something that has an incredible impact on every aspect of society, be it economy, politics, or culture.
There are plenty of people online who know about this power the internet has to boost a message, and will maliciously use it to cause harm to others or gain some kind of political or economical benefits. Therefore, it becomes necessary for platforms to work for the common good in counteracting harmful misinformation, not only to prevent harm, but to ensure that the well intentioned majority is not discredited by approximation.
The Consequences of Ending Fact-Checking
When platforms step away from fact-checking, the consequences can be severe. Here are a few key risks:
- Proliferation of Misinformation: Without fact-checking, false narratives can spread unchecked, leading to confusion and mistrust. This is particularly dangerous during critical events such as elections, public health crises, or natural disasters.
- Erosion of User Trust: Users expect platforms to act responsibly, especially when it comes to content accuracy. Eliminating fact-checking undermines this trust and can drive users away.
- Amplification of Harmful Content: Misinformation often goes hand in hand with harmful narratives, such as hate speech, conspiracy theories, or scams. Without systems in place to verify content, these narratives can gain traction and lead to real-world consequences.
- Regulatory and Reputational Risks: Platforms that fail to address misinformation may face increased scrutiny from regulators and lose credibility in the eyes of the public and advertisers.
Balancing Freedom of Expression and Content Integrity
That being said, malpractice in the exercise of a platform’s responsibility to fact check can also be especially harmful in a series of ways. For example:
- Bias and Censorship: Since fact checking, even if automated to some extent, requires human input, it is therefore subject to the possibility of bias. So, if users perceive that they are being treated with partiality, this may lead to accusations of censorship, undermining the platform’s credibility.
- Suppression of Minority Voices: Overzealous fact-checking efforts often run into the mistake of suppressing dissenting opinions or minority perspectives, especially in cases where the context is misunderstood or misinterpreted.
- Lack of transparency: If users do not understand why content is flagged or removed, or worse, perceive it to have been removed for illegitimate reasons, it can lead to frustration and mistrust, further fueling claims of unfairness.
- Corruption: If fact checking becomes guided not by the well being of the community, but by external interests in politics, the private sector, or even personal grudges, it will only have negative consequences for fact checking as a whole.
The Role of Technology in Fact-Checking
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have become essential tools in the fight against misinformation. These technologies can analyze patterns, detect false information, and flag potentially harmful content at scale. However, they’re not infallible. Human oversight remains critical to ensure nuanced and culturally sensitive decisions.
For example, AI can quickly identify content that matches known misinformation patterns, but human reviewers are needed to verify context and accuracy. This collaboration between technology and human judgment creates a more robust fact-checking process.
A Call to Action for Platforms and Leaders
Now, the fact that fact checking presents risks does not immediately mean we should abandon the practice entirely; instead, organizations need to double down on strategies that prioritize accuracy and user trust. Here are a few steps leaders can take:
- Invest in transparency: It’s a well known fact that people find it easier to adhere to guidelines they can understand. Therefore, these guidelines have been as clearly stated, and as simple as possible.
- Leverage Technology: AI and machine learning can be used to scale efforts while ensuring human oversight for critical cases.
- Foster Collaboration: Fact checking implies investigation and examination of reference, so it’s best to work closely with specialists and select them with the aim of getting as wide a perspective as possible, avoiding biased sourcing.
- Include the community: Provide resources to help users identify misinformation and understand how fact-checking works.
The Future of Fact-Checking
Every platform’s ability to fact check content depends on the level of trust that their communities are willing to invest, which in turn depends entirely on whether or not this community’s plurality of perspectives is being treated fairly. Trust is the foundation of user engagement, and without it, platforms risk losing their audiences and their relevance.
As program managers, tech leaders, and digital safety advocates, we have a responsibility to ensure that fact-checking remains a core part of our approach. By doubling down on truth, transparency, and collaboration, we can create a digital ecosystem where users feel safe, informed, and empowered.
If you’d like to see more insights similar to this one on the subject, feel free to follow me on my linkedin profile.
